Liability For Fire Cases

Modified: 16th Jul 2019
Wordcount: 257 words

Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written case summary. If you want to create an essay on any question or title, try out our AI Law Essay Writer.

Cite This

Liability For Fire

AT COMMON LAW

A person will be liable for damage done by fire in three situations. That is, if the damage was caused:

  1. wilfully;
  2. by negligence; or
  3. by the escape, without negligence, of a fire which was brought into existence by some non-natural user of the land. This principle is not exactly that of Rylands v Fletcher.

The defendant will be liable if:

  1. he brought on to his land things likely to catch fire, and kept them there in such conditions that, if they did ignite, the fire would be likely to spread to the plaintiff’s land;
  2. he did so in the course of some non-natural use; and
  3. the thing ignited and the fire spread

UNDER STATUTE

Section 86 of the Fires Prevention (Metropolis) Act 1774 modifies the common law. It provides:

“And no action, suit or process whatever shall be had, maintained or prosecuted against any person in whose house, chamber, stable, barn or other building, or on whose estate any fire shall … accidentally begin, nor shall any recompence be made by such person for any damage suffered thereby, any law, usage or custom to the contrary notwithstanding; … “

However, s86 has been interpreted restrictively and a fire will not be.accidental if it was started negligently or due to a nuisance. Relevant cases include:

Musgrove v Pandellis [1919] 2 KB 43

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Generate a new AI Essay from this title with Nomikos AI

  • Free to use
  • Takes under 2 minutes
  • No registration required
  • 2:1 level work

Suggest 3 More Related Essay Titles with Nomikos AI

  • 2:1 academic standard titles
  • Instant suggestions
  • No registration required

Get Academic Help Today!

Encrypted with a 256-bit secure payment provider