Customize your cookie preferences

We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.

We use cookies on our site to enhance your user experience, provide personalized content, and analyze our traffic. Cookie Policy.

Wiseman v Simpson

Modified: 17th Jun 2019
Wordcount: 326 words

Disclaimer: This is an example of a student written case summary. If you want to create an essay on any question or title, try out our AI Law Essay Writer.

Cite This

Wiseman v Simpson [1988] 1 WLR 35

Exclusion of a spouse from the premises of property of which he/she is a joint tenant.

Facts

A young unmarried, co-habiting couple were joint-tenants of a council flat. One year later, the relationship became unhappy and the women changed the locks and refused her partner re-entry of the flat. Living with his parents, the man applied to the Court under Section 1 of the Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976 for an order to allow him to return.

Issues

The question arose as to whether the women could lawfully exclude a joint tenant of the property from the premises in the context of their ‘spousal’ relationship.

Decision/Outcome

The Court held that Section 1 of the Domestic Violence Act 1976 must be read in lieu of Section 1(3) of the Matrimonial Homes Act 1983 which requires any order of exclusion of a spouse to be “just and reasonable” in consideration of all circumstances. The first instance court had ruled the man’s exclusion reasonable as he had alternative occupation and the couple ceased to be ‘in love.’ However, the Court of Appeal considered his exclusion to be “drastic” and reasoning to be “draconian” (p 43), emphasising the parties’ rights as joint tenants. The Court stipulated the principle that joint tenants of property simultaneously have “the right to occupy and neither can lawfully exclude the other.” (p 42). Thus, unless a joint tenant has legally infringed upon the rights of another, even if a joint tenant in property finds it intolerable to remain on the premises with another joint tenant, he/she would have no legal right nor remedy to exclude the other from occupation or possession of the property. Thus, the Court disapproved of the exclusion of the man from his flat and directed a new trial.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Generate a new AI Essay from this title with Nomikos AI

  • Free to use
  • Takes under 2 minutes
  • No registration required
  • 2:1 level work

Suggest 3 More Related Essay Titles with Nomikos AI

  • 2:1 academic standard titles
  • Instant suggestions
  • No registration required

Get Academic Help Today!

Encrypted with a 256-bit secure payment provider